"Emily L. Ferguson" <elf@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Sure. What would be different? > > If you have a Canon 10D, and probably other higher end Canons, > however, you can adjust the Kelvin on the shoot to compensate for > light temperature differences that would otherwise require 80a > filters, and interpreting your RAW capture in different ways can > simulate a split grad. > > Multiplying your sky layer can help to simulate a polarizer, too, > although I don't find it quite the same. In all of these cases, though, using the real filter will produce better results. Not that I usually bother, either. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
