From/Áðü: "Terry" terry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date/Çìåñ: 28-Öåâ-2005, 2:06 ðì Subject/ÈÝìá: Re: -Gallery X - (and a new question at the bottom) >Hello Shyrell >I would have to ask my printers at what res. they scan photos for printing, >one thing I know is that your digital camera has no where near the res that >a scanned photo needs to get the same quality print, if I can remember I >will call them tomorrow and ask, they have been doing this kind of thing for >a lot of years so if any one knows I am sure they will. >Terry M in order to perplexe matters worse... I was discussing digital dpi with a guy that *knows* information systems the other day... what he quoted was a law that you got to get a sample (read scan) at least twice (the more the best) the accuracy (read resolution/dpi) your finished product should be. reason is that you got to exclude sampling harmonics while extracting info...so we are starting with a 600dpi scan and up) BUT as anything mechanical scanners obviously do not run at their optimum at the edges of the scannning region (low and very high dpi). I believe there is a region that each scanner performs best, and it may coincide with the region that manufacturer has optimized the machine for....hmmm enjoy, kostas ====================================================== so... no matter what, CHEER UP MY FRIENDS! Life is too precious to jump the other side of the fence... kostas papakotas / clenched teeth photography http://groups.msn.com/clenchedteethphotography _____________________________________________________________________________________ http://www.mailbox.gr ÁðïêôÞóôå äùñåÜí ôï ìïíáäéêü óáò e-mail. http://www.thesuperweb.gr Website ìå ÁóöáëÝò Controlpanel áðü 6 Euro êáé äþñï ôï domain óáò!
