Brian van den Broek <bvande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > But, there is a pragmatic argument that (unless I missed it) no one > has advanced. The `enqued' number has, of late, been between 0 and 3, > and, if I recall aright, not every gallery over the last year has > managed to have 10 images. One might think then that there is plenty > of reason for the Gallery `staff' to take a permissive view and leave > the interesting question of whether Chris' images are photography or > photography-like aside. Yes, I mentioned something like that in one of my earlier posts -- that if a rule was being applied, it should only be used to exclude less-photographic images in favor of more-photogrpahic images; it should *not* be used to exclude an image in favor of an empty space. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
