Qkano <snapper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>Yes, actually. I did this that way: >>http://tinyurl.com/5lbop > > A quite "artistic" use of the technique. Works quite well for the > sunlight-through-the-trees. Thanks. I was kinda pleased with how that turned out. > On the whole, pre- and post- digital it's one of those "curiosities" > that comes and goes. We all give it a try (well, some of us) but it > never fids a real practical use. I played with it because of a discussion I was having with friends. They didn't really believe the water and cloud effects visible in the old Russian photos were just changes in the scene between the three exposures. (These friends weren't photographers.) I did my pictures to show (I confidently expected) the same effects, definitely coming out of the time differences between the exposures. Worked fine, and was convincing, so that's a win. And I picked up some additional experience, having actually *done* it leaves me understanding it better than just *thinking* about how it'd work. But I agree the technique is little more than a curiousity for modern work. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <mailto:dd-b@xxxxxxxx>, <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <http://noguns-nomoney.com/> <http://www.dd-b.net/carry/> Pics: <http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/> <http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera/Steven Brust: <http://dragaera.info/>
