Re: Film vs Digital (double exposures)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Time.  Spend a moment shooting onsite, the image is complete when
you
> download it.


Emily

OK: I knew there would be one ;o)

Can you post one of the double exposures you did in your former film
days to the gallery sometime so we can see what digital is robbing us
of ;o)



OK, with the exception of time (though frankly it seems a tiny
fraction of the total workflow time) ... any other reasons?

Thinks: is an image really complete until not only you have downloaded
it but done something with it.  Thinks, for saving time, get the two
half-exposures right in camera then after download it is a trivially
simple answer to 50:50 combine them byte for byte.  You don't need
photoshop, a PDA would do.  But later, if you had more time, you could
slide the 50:50 about to see what gave the best mix etc ...

With film you don't have the choice - you have to get it right.


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux