Re: Digital fakery ... easy to do well, easier to do badly.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What amazes me is that there are people who actually spot these things.

-dan c.

At 12:28 AM 30-10-04 +0100, Bob Talbot wrote:
>
>http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~aaron/images/screenshots/whatever-med.jpg
>
>OK
>
>This story only came to light this side of the pond in HIGNFY - a
>topical (comedy) news quiz.
>
>What's amazing is not that it happened, but that the lower echelons of
>the candidate's press dept didn't seem to have learned anything from
>the bad press a similar exposure [BBC & Evening Standard] brought
>something over a year ago
>http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/04/63011.html
>
>I'm certain no-one high up sanctioned this, that's really not the
>point. What is telling, to me, is that such fakery has become so
>unremarkable, so commonplace,  that the perpetrators probably can't
>see they were doing anything wrong.  Fake really has replaced fact -
>the new reality.
>
>C'mon guys, if you have to feed us fake images at least put some work
>into them - make them hard to spot  ;o)
>
>B
>
>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux