Isn't the number approximated by the ratio of two succeeding values in the Fibinacci series for large enough values of the series? -dan c. At 04:31 PM 18-07-04 -0400, Photogonow@xxxxxxx wrote: >In a message dated 7/17/04 11:08:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dd-b@xxxxxxxx >writes: > > > eight divided by five >> >> or so I'm told - - - > > And the math is wrong; 8/5 is 1.6 exactly. > -- ><><> > > > > YES, > > > > I also maintain -- unless You 'selectively break' -the rules- in >Photography, nothing will be learned! > > jIMMY
