RE: Question about lighting...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hmm.... interesting reply.  A tad on the negative side
considering all the helpful (and humorous) replies I
received before yours.

Unlike yourself, I was not born a professional
photographer.  I am trying to learn what I can about
photography techniques while I tackle my other job
responsibilities.

We do use an independant, professional, non-jaded type
photographer for some photo shoots, but we cannot
always justify the price he charges for every purpose.
 Most of what I do is for internal use, so it doesn't
need to be 'ass-kicking' quality, but I try to do the
best I can.

That's all.
--- Les Baldwin <fotofx@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Julie,
> 
> Unlike my colleagues on this list I feel that the
> actual question is not
> HOW we can help, but it should be, IF you should be
> helped. The pros on
> this list are not helping themselves or the other
> pros by assisting you.
> 
> No offense intended but this is really the realm of
> the professional,
> qualified commercial photographer. The reason your
> images are low in
> quality has nothing to do with the EQUIPMENT, but
> your actual skills.
> 
> Your company has several sites, and what looks like
> enough income to
> hire a good photographer to do your marketing
> images, yet they want you
> to do it for free. Even if you have basic photo
> skills you should not do
> any photography for them without either charging
> them extra or (unless
> you were hired to be a photographer in which case
> you do not have even
> basic skills).
> But if you are here in our forum asking basic
> questions you should not
> be charging for image creation either.
> 
> That leads me to think that you and/your company
> feels that having a
> better camera makes you a better photographer, which
> is also false. The
> images you posted are barely good enough for the
> average company access
> badge much less advertising or marketing. 
> 
> Go to your manager and tell them to hire a pro you
> will get better
> results, faster, and the images will help generate
> the needed business,
> and you can go back to your regular job. Nothing
> looks worse on the
> printed page then bad photography.
> 
> Les Baldwin
> Professional photographer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julie A" <juliebread@yahoo.com>
> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators -
> Professionals - Students"
> <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:06 AM
> Subject: Question about lighting...
> 
> 
> > Hi ho,
> >
> > I'm Julie.
> > I'm trying to get some advice on lighting.  Please
> let
> > me know if this is not the appropriate place to
> ask
> > this.
> >
> > Here's the deal.  At work I take pictures of
> > co-workers for marketing purposes.  The camera I
> use
> > is a basic Sony digital camera (2.1 megapixel)
> with a
> > simple  flash.
> >
> > Needless to say, indoor pictures stink with this
> > set-up.  The pictures come out dark, the digital
> color
> > information isn't there, and the light diffusion
> is
> > virtually non-existent.
> >
> > I recently borrowed a Canon digital camera with a
> > nicer flash.  One that I could tilt towards the
> > ceiling to bounce the flash to diffuse the light. 
> The
> > lighting in these pics was fantastic compared to
> the
> > Sony set-up.
> >
> > Unfortunately, our budget is limited so the Canon
> > w/nice flash is out (~$1,200).  And I cannot buy
> the
> > flash only because the Sony doesn't support
> external
> > flashes.
> >
> > For reference, here's a pic from each camera -
> don't
> > laugh ;)
> > Sony:
> > http://www.precisionind.com/pic1.png
> > Canon:
> > http://www.precisionind.com/pic2.png
> >
> > So my (long winded) question is, assuming the Sony
> CAN
> > take good pictures w/appropriate lighting, what
> kind
> > of indoor lighting solution would anyone
> recommend?
> > I've thought of the nice big, round diffusing
> lights
> > you see at the photography studio.   Would that do
> the
> > trick?  Are these affordable (around $300-400)?
> >
> > Anyway, sorry for my lack of proper terminology.
> > Thanks for any advice!
> > Julie
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
> > http://photos.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> >
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux