Re: easy way to choose shutter speed for panning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andy,
	
	Thanks for breaking it down so clearly. It helps a LOT! Happy New Year to you and all the others on the list.
	
Deen

At 2003-12-28, 08:49:00 you wrote:

>Deen,
>
>>QUESTION: Say i want to shoot moving subjects, I realise the amount of
>>background blur will depend on the subject movement, distance from the camera,
>>focal length used, etc, but is there a nice rule of thumb to work out an
>>optimal shutter speed?
>
>I don't know of a rule-of-thumb but I'll try to come up with something close.
>First of all you need to determine how much blur you want - this is somewhat
>subjective I would think. Using your camera's viewframe as the reference you'd
>say that you want subjects in the background to blur a fraction of the size of
>the frame. Let's say you decide you want blur to be something like 1/10th of
>the frame's horizontal direction (which is also the direction along which you
>are panning). Since the frame is 36mm wide this would mean you want the blur to
>be about 3.6mm (or 4mm rounded off). 
>         
>Now you need to determine how long it takes subjects in the background to move
>across your frame from edge to edge as you are panning. Estimating is OK. This
>will obvioulsy vary depending on many of the factors you mentioned above plus
>more. Let's say that given the subject you are planning to photograph this is
>about 1/4 second. 
>
>The implication of this is that images of subjects in the background move 36mm
>in 1/4 second or that they are moving at a rate of about (36mm / 1/4 second)
>150mm per second. 
>                                                                             
>To determine which exposure time will provide 4mm of blur when the image is
>moving 150mm per second you divide the desired background blur by the rate of
>movement of the background images and out comes the required exposure time. 
>
>In this case it would be 4mm / 150mm per second or .0266 seconds which is about
>1/3.75 or rounded off about 1/4 second.
>
>I hope this helps and is not too far off!
>
>Andy Davidhazy
>andpph@rit.edu


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux