Yep, not a thing in there about top vs. bottom posting or in-between posting. I do not ever attach anything to my messages without prior permission (and never to a group) and then nothing but plain text messages. And I never originate HTML-posts (but after a recent re-install of my mail reader I found that it had obligingly reset my preferences to reply-in-kind to HTML messages). My original comment was to a bloke that replied off topic to another thread since he either did not know how to start a thread or didn't care. At that point someone (who shall remain nameless) jumped all over my case about top-posting. darkroommike ---------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karl Shah-Jenner" <shahjen@iinet.net.au> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:02 AM Subject: Re: HTML was Top or Bottom? (poster, that is!) WAS Re: Dimming hot lights > Mike writes: > > It's just that there are some self-appointed users that feel it necessary > to > > police the rest of us and keep us to a "standard" (which I have never seen > > posted as a condition to contribute to this or any other group) feel free > to > > reply if you think you've been singled out, we'll then know who the under > > cover USENET cops are > > from the welcome message we all recieve when signing up to photoforum: > "5. Please, please DO NOT EVER send image files or other attachments to the > list. Also, please take the trouble to trim quoted material to pertinent > points and send messages only in plain text - do not use HTML format for > messages sent to the list" > > > karl >
