Re: my new photo site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Funny how important The Entertainment Experience is to some though,
I guess
> I may be a bit conservative but my interest in web material is
information..
> If I were a Flash designer I suppose it would all be quite relevant
but as a
> stills photographer I see no benefit.
>
> ..nothing more annoying than having to click an 'enter' page or wade
through
> a component instal.


OK, a quote from a web design site that promotes Flash

<<<
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/dreamweaver/articles/dwmx_design_t
ips.html
Yes, I work for Macromedia and I do think Macromedia Flash MX is cool.
However, anything that doesn't contribute directly to the
understanding of the site or doesn't impart information should be
thought about long and hard. If your user thinks she has to wait for
unimportant stuff to download to use your site, she is going to lose
patience and leave.
The worst offender here is the large introduction. Give the user
information and not fluff. You should never even be in the situation
where you should contemplate a "skip intro" button.

On the other hand, if you use Macromedia Flash MX to create a useful
movie describing how to use a product, to illustrate a technique, or
to present dynamic data in a rich Internet application, then you're on
the right track. There are some excellent examples of how to create
Macromedia Flash MX content that improve a site dramatically. Check
out the Pet Market application to see an excellent use of Macromedia
Flash MX.
>>>


Key issue: if it adds nothing to the information then it's fluff.  If
someone can't visit your site because they are not willing to download
the fluff-player app. then you have lost the visit for NO benefit.  If
you have static photos: Flash only, inevitably, slows up viewing them.
Indeed, if you go somewhere else then come back for a second look
Flash guarantees you wait for the whole time again - no reduction for
being in cache.

Ah, but you cannot "download" images from Flash.  The first time
someone claimed that I'd never tried but it took under 5 minutes to
extract the files from the *.swf files *** DOWNLOADED *** into cache.
Now it takes a couple of mouse clicks.

On a slow connection anything that slows up access to the information
is a pain.  On a fast connection it's still a waste of time.



Bob
Another conservative



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux