<<<The lighting was better but I didn't manage to get any poses she liked. She was looking for glamour shots but this shot really captures who she is right now. >>> Greg, the context in which you referred to "Glamour shots" got me wondering if the usage here was the same as over there. Here for sure if a client asked for "glamour" shots chances are they would involve not many clothes. So taking a quick straw poll the answer was by no means clear. I'm sure your model wasn't wanting to get her kit off ... http://www.aestheticdesign.com/glamour_photography.html "Glamour photography may seem the same as boudoir photography but there is one important difference. In boudoir photography the model is the client, whereas in glamour photography the model is hired for the work. Glamour modeling includes swimsuit, lingerie, and tasteful nude modeling, like what you would see in Playboy magazine." http://www.photoprostudio.com/glamour.htm Glamour Photography is designed to allow our clients that dreamy, soft, romantic look they truly deserve. Usually consisting of head and shoulder portraits, the overall purpose is to make our subjects as glamorous as they can possibly be. I don't think I've ever heard anyone use the term "boudoir photography" in the UK. It looks pretty much like what I had though was encompassed by "glamour". You know, just short of totally nude with erotic overtones. So a simple question: is there a universally agreed distinction or is it just semantics? Bob
