hi i read the article with some interest where are the negatives if there are none then any argument is effectively moot although i am only an amateur i wonder if film is as obosolete as all that perhaps in the future it will be the only proof (my big problems with these pictures is they seem pushed (or pulled) and that the resolution seems very high when, given the light conditions, the photographer would seem to have had to use a very fast film with correspondingly less resolution) i think that the real question here is what will be the proof with digital yours fred.vansand2@verizon.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory david Stempel FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g" <fyrframe@centurytel.net> To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: NGS SNAFU? > Are they asleep over at National Geograpic? Check this nature photography > site for details; > http://www.naturephoto.hu/home/index.html > > Take care, > Gregory david Stempel > FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g > www.americanphotojournalist.com > "The brave ones were shooting the enemy, the crazy ones were shooting film" >
