So nudity on an international list where kids may see it
is okay, but profanity isn't?
Lines have to be drawn somewhere. The nudity we are talking about is not pornography so it is not the end of the catagory. Profanity on the other had is the end of the catagory. Nudist colonies let children see nudity but discourage profanity.
But the other question really has to do with the puritanical standards/ guilt that still exist in the US over viewing nudes even classical nudes like the sculpture of David (located in Italy). The question has to do with whether a warning should be used or not,
As to the actual picture in the gallery; Not the best of facial expression, hope it is scanner artifact that make her look in pain. As to the public hair itself it is obviously the model had shaved hair to get into a bikini (maybe for a different modeling job) but as to nude photography it looks funny.
