Luis, >>> the suggestion that accepting nudes in an art/photography setting is the same as removing all boundaries is unreasonable, in my opinion. <<<< Unlike you to miss the point. It's not about what type of photography is presented in the gallery, nor is it about nudes in art. It's about those list members who are offended by some action on the list or in it's gallery. We have had a member state very clearly they were offended. Period. It does not matter why and it would make no sense why they should not have been offended by pubic hair in their coffee but is definitely a no to use profanity. Although rather presumptuous on my part, it seems the list has to some degree declared Rosemarie's offended nature to be a bit over reacting. So why is it then okay to allow that same reaction for some other reason such as the use of profanity. How can one have a rule the allows the potential of members to be offended on one hand but not the other? Just seems like a double standard to me. Take care, Gregory david Stempel FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g www.americanphotojournalist.com
