Re: Photo in New Yorker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You can make the highlights any shape you want by modifying the front of
your softbox with black material, hexagons=umbrellas,
squares/rectangles=softbox, rings(?)=ringlites (probably, more usual for
macro shots but popular at one time for fashion work)
darkroommike

----------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Eichhorn" <eichhorn@uh.edu>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: Photo in New Yorker


> Emily,
>
> I recall seeing little white hexagons in the eyes of portraits shown
> in an exhibit at the Houston Museum of Natural Sciences several years
> ago.  I assumed that they were images of the photographer's umbrella
> flash setup, or the diaphragm in the camera lens -- essentially
> reflections from the surface of the eyeball.  Every portrait had
> them.  Is this a possible explanation?
>
> Roger
>
> >I've been looking through New Yorkers the last few weeks, when I'm
> >not trying to work, or when the computer is bugging me.
> >
> >And I've come across a photo of Max Roach by Martin Schoeller,
> >published in the June 5, 2000 New Yorker.
> >
> >Now I know there's hardly any chance that more than four people on
> >this list have kept their New Yorkers back that far, but if you're
> >among them I'd appreciate if you'd take a look at that photograph,
> >on page 91, and tell me what you think makes the little tiny white
> >rings in the corneas of Roach's eyes.
> >
> >thanks
>
>
> --
>


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux