Re: why does digital looks better?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students<
photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
>
Subject
: Re: why does digital looks better?
From
: "Robert G. Earnest" <
robert@earnestphoto.com
>
Date
: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:33:14 -0800
References
: <
5.2.0.9.2.20030214130000.0113b818@pop.photo-miracles.com
>
Reply-to
:
photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
Sender
:
owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu
methinks it is time to change the subject line. r
References
:
Re: why does digital looks better?
From:
Rob Miracle
Prev by Date:
Re: Sepia and Sellinium Toning In PS
Next by Date:
RE: why does digital looks better?
Previous by thread:
Re: why does digital looks better?
Next by thread:
RE: why does digital looks better?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Share Photos]
[Epson Inkjet]
[Scanner List]
[Gimp Users]
[Gimp for Windows]
