Re: photography+gallery+low+quality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In a message dated 1/30/03 11:41:49, chandler@yomogi.or.jp writes, among 
other things:

<< I found the navigation a bit hard to follow. >>

Yes, the navigation could use a litle work.  I'm on the learn-as-you-go 
method of web design.  Sorry you're forced to view on a small monitor, but it 
looks ok to me on my 14" iBook.  How does the use of frames keep text out of 
search engines?  I ask, though I would rather have people entering the site 
through the front door.

<< Oh, and pleeease: the bit about "electronic downloading". The so-called
normal process of viewing a website with a browser consists
***PRECISELY*** of electronic downloading. >>

Which is ***PRECISELY*** why I put in this phrase: "except in the normal 
course of online viewing."  I'm not too worried about teletypes or people 
saving copies on their computer for future reference.  I just want people to 
be aware that I value my work and they are not free to use it in violation of 
my copyright.

I don't have a "no-right-click" script on my site, and I'm one of the 
technique's major detractors.


Cheers,

Rich Mason
Photographer-at-Large
<A HREF="http://www.richmason.com/";>http://richmason.com</A>
See the new section: Rich on the Road


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux