In reply I would charge 1 to 10 cents for the view of images but the technology gets in the way. The system uses credit card payments so is limited to over two dollars for each transaction so to be effective $3 is about the minimum fee. I'm hoping for micro payments technology to be invented so I can use that. Chris mailto:nimbo@ukonline.co.uk http://www.chrissdomain.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu [mailto:owner-photoforum@listserver.isc.rit.edu]On Behalf Of Brian Chandler Sent: 28 January 2003 11:53 To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students Subject: Re: my re-vamped web site Doug Seibert <dougseibert2001@yahoo.com> writes: > Sorry Chris........I think you're kicking a dead horse > here.......... It's not worth the "dollars" to see the > larger images......and where are YOUR images........I > would have expected some (clickable)links at the > photographer's portrait image......Doug Yes, I'm afraid my prediction for customers per year is zero. If you had a way of charging $0.01 per thumbnail, now you'd be in business. > > For interest I am using the technology provided by > > "clickbank" And for some reason this use of the word "technology" to refer to an online payment system strikes me as absurd. The "technology" I'm using to bring you this email is called Neurodigital Activation. That will be three shillings, please. Brian Chandler ---------------- geo://Sano.Japan.Planet_3 Jigsaw puzzles from Japan at: http://imaginatorium.org/shop/
