When I read angle of view, I interpreted it as angle of the view to the viewer. Not as in "wide angle and wider angle". Just tired I guess but even now I have trouble with the term "angle of view". it seems wrong inasmuch as the angle of view is not a purely intrinsic attribute of a particular lens but rather relies upon the format it is being applied to (with coverage assumed). I'm still tired and probably not making much sense. r David Thompson wrote: > > Don't know about you - I got 100%. > > Which one(s) did you miss? > > -dt- >
