Re: "peer review"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Deen,

Suggestions on how one may modify an image is not criticism, but ideas. Like
a bunch of us having a beer at a local pub, bantering over the ideas of what
makes a good image, what makes memorable art.

Galen Rowell took a philosophical viewpoint. Elliot Porter, a iconoclastic
point of view and John Shaw's point was for technical accuracy both in
exposure control and composition. All three would provide the gallery with
different assessments of just about anything discussed.

I have never be attracted to model, advertising or wedding photography but
do feel it's important to suggest as a gallery review comment on what I
would find most interesting in viewing that type of imaging.

How does one critique a news image if they spend their time photographing
nudes or studio product shooting?


Take care,
Gregory david Stempel
FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g




[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux