Russell Baker <rebphoto@pronetisp.net> writes: > Hi Gang......... > > In regards to my wavy negs................... > > After spending a day or so in their sleeves > they printed fine and every thing is rosy. > > I mentioned before that a good majority > of my business was in providing > Head Shots for performers. > > Has anyone here been using > inkjet digital prints for this? > > I understand that I can take a digital > file and have it printed on "real" paper, > but I was wondering how the general > public has been accepting Head Shots > printed on inkjet type paper? > > (remember we are talking B&W) I've been doing it mostly for book-jacket photos, and for that, mostly I can send it electronically (sometimes after some debate). I've sent inkjet prints to some publishers, a few years ago, without complaint and with good results. It's hard to produce decent inkjet prints at the prices you can get contact printed "quantity" prints from a lab for, if it's the sort of head-shots that they go through in quantity. > I'm looking into purchasing either > an Olympus E 10 or E 20. > > I wonder if the slightly larger > megapixel difference between > the two cameras will make > that much difference in an 8x10? Probably not, especially with clean studio lighting. -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@dd-b.net / http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Dragaera mailing lists, see http://dragaera.info
