Re: PF exhibits on 14-SEP-02 (thumbnail review)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I do not wish to offend anyone - as this is just my opinion only.
(but -
> yeah!  anyOne after # 5 is going to Hate me)  All I can say  Hey-
'this is
> ShowBiz'  - & any Review is better than -NO Review!!
> jIMMY


Well,  it's probably sour grapes but actually no review might be
marginally better than a review from someone who has not looked at the
images  ;o)

> Below- is my own 'Top Ten List'  -using my right eye (left brain)
and viewing
> the thumbnail photos only.

The full scale images are what the contributors submit for us to look
at:  the thumbs are what Andy produces for us as a way of indexing the
images.
It is more than just scale it is what we choose to include.

On one occasion I reviewed here I noted first what I thought of the
thumbs then how I saw the images after opening them:  the two are
poles apart.  For me some images never get sent because at 400x300
pixels (72 dpi for the technically challenged) there just is not
enough detail to do the detail justice.


Q














[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux