"Emily L. Ferguson" wrote: > > Hey, Robert. My remark was in response to the hilarious citation > that me@myplace sent to the list in response to poor beaver. You > should check it out. You'd probably enjoy it It was a storyboard sequence, wasn't it? It looked like a student project. cute. > > Or maybe not. > > My version of the movie came through as 7 separate pieces of the > usual heiroglyphic gobbledygook. What format is the movie? > Quicktime? .mov > > Does it use the title colloquially?!!! It was two little tv commercials for Molson Canadian beer premised on the fabulous beaver that we Canadians enjoy. Probably a spoof. Certainly silly. Probably funny. Maybe neither. Sorry if I am cranky these days. As long time list members know there are 3 things that drive me crazy. Flower and plant photographs that are not in my top 250,000 all time favorites. Sunset photographs that are not in my top 300, 000 all time favorites and people who ask the list how they should do the copywork assignment that they have just accepted. (Is Velvia OK? On 35mm? How about digital?....aaarrrrrrgh!) I actually had to leave the list for a while after my extraordinarily rude behaviour towards the last person that asked that one. Remember? Jan looked like Ghandi by comparison. Today, I accidentally posted something to the list. I don't know HOW it happened but it did. I apologized. What more can I do? Sorry that I didn't like your flower pictures, Charles. I rarely do. I have to admit that it was probably your solicitation for general input a second time when we have a gallery for that purpose that was really what fired me off. If a list member has a specific issue that the list can help with, than I think posting the url to an image is perfectly legitimate. Simply posting images and asking for comments is to jump the queue of the people that have submitted images to the gallery for the same purposes. I am a bully. I don't stand quietly for queue jumpers. sorry again to all for everything. r (sheesh)
