Re:Canon 80-200mm f4.5-5.6 USM????

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 

 Brian Blankenship wrote:

Ok I know I'm no lens expert but, how the heck does a small aperture range
make a "better" lens? I mean let just point out the bad points here. the
smaller aperture means you need either longer exposures, or much faster
film. Also, every teacher I have ever asked about this has said that the
smaller the aperture is the lower the image quality. Now I can see how that
could just be a preference thing but, you can't change the physics of
having a small aperture and needing more light or faster film.

Also a lens with such a small range of apertures offer VERY little in the
way of creative abilities. (Blurring backgrounds and such)


At 07:00 PM 8/6/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> Charles wrote ---
>
> > I found a Canon EF 80-200mm f4.5-5.6 ULTRASONIC lens in great >shape
> (near mint) in a used camera store and I´´m tempeted to buy >it but I
> coul Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux