I guess I don't read it that way, which is part of the problem I heartily agree that this proposal deserves go away. Anyone who wants a little advice on how to communicate with Congress, feel free to email me offline. I'm certainly going to let them know what I think about this. Rick -----Original Message----- From: owner-photoforum@ase-listmail.rit.edu [mailto:owner-photoforum@ase-listmail.rit.edu] On Behalf Of PhotoRoy6@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:15 PM To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students Subject: Re: Congress to ban photography of minors?! In a message dated 5/14/02 7:38:06 AM EST, rxmoore@centurytel.net writes: > underage models-for-hire (arguably, a > product) be legal? Under the proposed law this would be illegal. But if you reworded the website to say underage models for hire to sell your product or service then you would be siting on the line between illegal and legal. The country will be better off if this proposal doesn't get out of the committee.
