Re: Digital Plunge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Dave and David,

I tried the E20 on a simple construction boot product shot on white at a 3/4
angle. I was never quite able to get the front of the boot and the rear of
the heel completely in focus. No matter where I tried to focus (one third
into the image etc.) there was always some part of the boot slightly soft. I
also tried to used the zoom lens in less of a telephoto length but found it
distorted or exaggerated the lines of the product too much.

I finally ended up using a Fuji S1 with a 24 to 120 zoom (I cannot really
remember the lens) and had none of the above mentioned problems.

Thanks again for the pointers,

Roderick


> I would think an E20 lens zoomed to about 20mm would give a "normal"
> perspective. At f11 you would then get a less than 2mm sized lens opening
> and a hyper focal distance of about 3.5 feet. Anything between around 2.5
> feet and infinity would be in focus. This should seem to be adequate for
> most purposes. Any smaller lens opening would surely lead to defraction
> problems.
> 
> In my experience it is difficult to get a _shallow_ DOF with a "consumer"
> digicam. I sure seem to do a lot of background blurring in my image editor.
> 
> Dave
> East Englewood

> From: David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@dd-b.net>
> 
> Did you *measure* the depth of field?  My most common problem in
> digital is *excess* depth of field, because of the small sensor size
> and hence the short focal length of the lenses.  They tend not to have
> really small apertures because stopping down that far gets seriously
> into diffraction territory on such short focal length lenses.... 


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux