On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Harald Fuchs wrote: > In article <20090816122526.GW5407@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Sam Mason <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I've just had a look and PG does actually seem to be returning values as > > I'd expect, i.e. 0 <= n < 1. > > That's what everyone would expect. If it's really implemented like > that the documentation is wrong, isn't it? Yup, the code is doing the right thing. I submitted a patch to the docs and Tom committed a, somewhat more readable, version of it last night. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-08/msg00197.php -- Sam http://samason.me.uk/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
