In article <20090816122526.GW5407@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sam Mason <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've just had a look and PG does actually seem to be returning values as > I'd expect, i.e. 0 <= n < 1. That's what everyone would expect. If it's really implemented like that the documentation is wrong, isn't it? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
