Alvaro Herrera-7 wrote: > > tomrevam wrote: > > This is why Tom was suggesting you to increase wal_buffers. Did > you try that? > > Increasing the wal_buffers improved the performance. Is there a limit on how big I can raise them? Is there anything that would work worse with bigger wal_buffers? Thanks, Tomer -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/synchronous_commit%3Doff-doesn%27t-always-return-immediately-tp24621119p24712612.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
