Mike Christensen wrote:
We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch
Postgres and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house
that is)..
You must have a REALLY nice house with a LOT of equity...
Mike
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@xxxxxxx
<mailto:spam_eater@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and
the others still
replicate amongst themselves?)
I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand
over the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node
goes down that is current processing the statement.
Thomas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
