2009/6/23 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:28 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: >> The only one that is remotely viable is slony and it is so quirky you >> may as well forget it. > > Like what? I agree that Slony-I is not a plug-in-play replication > solution, but I don't agree that it is so quirky. > >> The rest are in some stage of decay/abandonment. There is no real >> replication available for postgresql. > > There are: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling > > IIRC only Slony-II and PGCluster-II is abandoned. PGCluster-I is not > up2date, but the others are being worked on. I wonder how many replication engines for MySQL never got built because "it already has replication built in"? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
