Mike Christensen wrote: > Hi all - > > I'm considering changing all my "timestamp" columns to "timestamp with > timezone" columns instead. The reason is I want to use UTC time for > everything in the DB and on the web server, and only ever convert to local > time on the client itself. I could use a timestamp and just "know" that the > timezone is UTC, but npgsql seems to handle this a lot better (like set the > "Kind" property to UTC, etc) if you have a timestamptz column type. > > I'm curious if there's any perf drawbacks to doing this, or would the only > perf hit be if I were comparing timestamp with timestamptz and doing all > sorts of casts and stuff. Thanks! I don't think there is any measurable difference in the two data types, and timestamptz is usually superior, as you have found. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general