> It's far easier to backup and restore a database than millions of small > files. Small files = random disk I/O. The real downside is the CPU time > involved in storing and retrieving the files. If it isn't a show stopper, > then putting them in the database makes all kinds of sense. On the contrary, I think backup is one of the primary reasons to move files *out* of the database. Decent incremental backup software greatly reduces the I/O & time needed for backup of files as compared to a pg dump. (Of course this assumes the managed files are long-lived.) -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.killerbytes.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
