Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Different handling of PL/pgSQL for-loop variables in 8.3.7 vs. 8.2.7 ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

2009/6/10 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> "Atul Chojar" <achojar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> So in 8.3.7, the incrementing of the for-loop variable "idx" is being
>> ignored; that is not the case in 8.2.7. Is this a new feature of 8.3.7 or a
>> bug?
>
> It's the new implementation.  Depending on unspecified implementation
> details is a good way to have broken code.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

we should to mark control varables as read-only?

regards
Pavel Stehule

> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux