On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Dave Page<dpage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Gurjeet Singh<singh.gurjeet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It still doesn't support raw device. > > Nor is it ever likely to. Filesystems are vastly superior now than > when certain other DBMSs were designed to use raw devices, and for > PostgreSQL to replace the average filesystem now with something as > reliable, performant and well tested would take a significant amount > of effort for little, if any, gain. As the 'solid state drive' train continues to leave the station, this will become more and more true. Flash based SSD and hard drives have very different operating characteristics that require cooperation between the device, filesystem, and o/s if you want things to work optimally. Why reinvent the wheel? I think the trend is in in the other direction...applications are trying to dispatch as much work in dealing with I/O into the kernel and out of user space as possible. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
