Good Morning Irene could you verify the requirement to set max_fsm_pages (integer) to 16 times new value of 'max_fsm_relations' Thanks! Martin Gainty ______________________________________________ Disclaimer and Confidentiality/Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung / Note de déni et de confidentialité This message is confidential. If you should not be the intended receiver, then we ask politely to report. Each unauthorized forwarding or manufacturing of a copy is inadmissible. This message serves only for the exchange of information and has no legal binding effect. Due to the easy manipulation of emails we cannot take responsibility over the the contents. > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:23:49 -0700 > From: ibarg@xxxxxxxx > To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: number of relations reported by vacuumdb -av > > never mind....I found the answer in the archives.postgresql.org. The > answer is 'yes' I use the sum of relations from all of the databases. So > I have reset 'max_fsm_relations' from 1000 to 2000. > > Irene Barg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a PostgreSQL installation with 8 databases (counting postgres, > > template0, and template1). I run 'vacuumdb -z' daily on 3 of the largest > > user databases. The vacuumdb logs show the 'max_fsm_pages' need to be > > increased with almost each vacuum. So I did a 'vacuumdb -av' on all the > > db's: > >> INFO: free space map contains 81016 pages in 100 relations > >> DETAIL: A total of 80000 page slots are in use (including overhead). > >> 187792 page slots are required to track all free space. > >> Current limits are: 80000 page slots, 1000 relations, using 534 KB. > >> NOTICE: number of page slots needed (187792) exceeds max_fsm_pages > >> (80000) > >> HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_fsm_pages" > >> to a value over 187792. > >> VACUUM > > > > I have a couple questions. > > > > 1) I can increase 'max_fsm_pages' from 80K to 200K, but why does it keep > > growing? > > > > The main database sees on average 2500-5000 rows inserted per day, and > > deletes are relatively small (although I don't have stats on deletes). > > > > 2) How is '100 relations' getting calculated? > > > > If I connect to each one of my 8 db's and do: > > > > select count(*) from pg_class; > > > > The total number of relations is 1725. So shouldn't I increase > > 'max_fsm_relations' from 1000 to 1725? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > -- irene > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Irene Barg Email: ibarg@xxxxxxxx > > NOAO/AURA Inc. http://www.noao.edu/noao/staff/ibarg > > 950 N. Cherry Ave. Voice: 520-318-8273 > > Tucson, AZ 85726 USA FAX: 520-318-8360 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Irene Barg Email: ibarg@xxxxxxxx > NOAO/AURA Inc. http://www.noao.edu/noao/staff/ibarg > 950 N. Cherry Ave. Voice: 520-318-8273 > Tucson, AZ 85726 USA FAX: 520-318-8360 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out. |