On Saturday 11 April 2009 9:10:33 am lists@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > There are, although we don't spell the commands like that. This is > > not > > relevant to the question of whether it makes sense to connect without > > being connected to a specific database. It doesn't, because the > > catalogs that you have to inspect to find out anything are > > database-specific. > > > > regards, tom lane > > I'm sorry, I'm confused by your reply. I may have said "table" when I > meant "database". I believe it absolutely *does* make sense to > connect without specifying a database first. What if you hit that > edge case where there are in fact no databases? I suppose you could > always run "createdb" just in case before you do anything else, but > that seems counterintuitive. > > What do you mean when you say the "catalogs...are database- > specific" ? If I'm understanding what you're saying, my whole point > is that I don't want to be tied to a database to do any kind of > querying about the PG engine itself. Does that make sense? > > Best, > Michael Might try looking at the pg_database file in ~/DATADIR/global. It lists the databases in the cluster. -- Adrian Klaver aklaver@xxxxxxxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
