Search Postgresql Archives

Re: nooby Q: temp tables good for web apps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Tom Lane wrote:
Kenneth Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I am porting a datamining web app to postgres from a non-sql datastore and plan to use temporary tables quite a bit, to manage collections the user will be massaging interactively. They might search and find anywhere from 50 to 50k items, then filter that, unfilter, sort, etc.

The main issue you should think about is whether the required lifespan
of the temp tables matches up with your application's use of database
connections.  If you are going through a connection pooler, for example,
it can be pretty awkward to hold onto the connection that has got the
temp table instances you need.  Web apps in general tend to have a hard
time maintaining such state across successive page references, so I'm
afraid this could be a show-stopper for you.

Ah, I should disclosed I am a relative web application nooby as well. But our design depends anyway on the same server process handling a web session from start to finish, and I thought this was doable with sufficient effort. I mean, I asked and people said it could be arranged. Not so? Yes, I am doomed. But if we can do that, I already have a ton of logic for keeping sessions separate and for hanging onto a connection for the life of a session (most requests use a PG connection pooler, the ones that need to see the temp tables use a dedicated connection (or two I think I might need). Keep sessions separate by working the session key into the temp table name...well, that's the plan anyway.


Some on the team think I am nuts, but one reason given was the absence of indices and I see (a) temporary tables *can* be indexed

Yeah, whoever claimed that is simply uninformed, or at least is
well-informed about some other database.

I think I misrepresented their position. They did not say it, but I think they were referring to some hairy freetext indexing they did on the permanent tables. And that's OK, we do not need that on the temp tables.

thx for the input, I will study up on the viability of getting a session managed by the same process throughout.

ken

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux