Glen Parker wrote:
pg_dump is not acceptable to us because of the potential to lose many hours of valuable data. Why would pg_dump even be relevant to this discussion? PITR offers a benefit that pg_dump does not, a benefit that we, and countless other organizations, obviously find useful. Suggesting that a person who's been managing PG in a commercial setting since version 6.4 should just use pg_dump as an alternative to PITR is, well, rather insulting.
Dude, you were the one who started with calling other people's ideas "silly". To be aggrieved when they respond in kind is, well, silly.
-- Lew -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
