Glen Parker <glenebob@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> ... AFAICS what >> Glen is proposing is to not WAL-log index changes, and with that any >> crash no matter how minor would have to invalidate indexes. > Nooo...! This has nothing to do with WAL logging index changes. How so? In any PITR-based situation it seems to me you need to worry about the WAL bulk a lot more than the bulk of the base backup. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
