On Mar 6, 2009, at 3:49 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:33:30PM -0500, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
So my question is really, what's the difference and why doesn't this
work with PL/PGSQL functions?
because it is long-time limitation of setof-returning plplsql
functions
(i think all pl/*).
it is removed in 8.4
I also now see that 8.4 has its own unnest function built in. http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/functions-array.html
One more reason to look forward to 8.4, I suppose. Until then, I
suppose I'm sticking with my custom C library. :(
Thanks!
eric
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
