Search Postgresql Archives

Re: set-valued function called in context that cannot accept a set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:33:30PM -0500, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
> So my question is really, what's the difference and why doesn't this  
> work with PL/PGSQL functions?

because it is long-time limitation of setof-returning plplsql functions
(i think all pl/*).
it is removed in 8.4
http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2008/11/03/waiting-for-84-pl-srf-functions-in-selects/

depesz

-- 
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz  /  blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz@xxxxxxxxxx / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux