Tom Lane wrote:
Glen Parker <glenebob@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
For some reason I got into my head the notion that a sequence could be
dropped even if reference by a field default. This seems pretty silly now.
It was true once upon a time, but we have an enforcement mechanism now
to catch that. Did you find the default you needed to get rid of?
That 2604 row should be it.
I did find it. 2604 is "pg_attrref", which now that you point it out
makes a certain amount of sense, but I would have had no idea what to do
with that an hour ago.
Thanks :-)
-Glen
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
