Glen Parker <glenebob@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > For some reason I got into my head the notion that a sequence could be > dropped even if reference by a field default. This seems pretty silly now. It was true once upon a time, but we have an enforcement mechanism now to catch that. Did you find the default you needed to get rid of? That 2604 row should be it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
