Hi. >From the manual I read that timestamps are stored as double but they can also be stored as 8 byte integers. I understand the precision problem with floats and the limited range of the integers and I feel confident that I should not worry about the Year 294276 or Year 5874897 problems (highest values that can be stored) so I ask for your experience on this matter when it comes to all other operations. On the x86-64 platform, I guess that 8 byte integers are generally handled faster than double floatingpoint numbers? Are operations like NOW + INTERVAL ' 232 HOURS' also faster with integers? Are there considerable timesavings? There are basically two operations I want to do (a lot!) SELECT ... ORDER BY my_timestamp; and SELECT ... WHERE my_timestamp > now(); -- or better using some variable for the now value to avoid all the function calls. Btw, what are the words of wisdom when it comes to creating index for fields of timestamp type, or other clever things? Best wishes. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general