Tom Lane wrote: > Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx> writes: > > This is what my 8.3 manual says: > > > conkey │ int2[] │ pg_attribute.attnum │ If a table constraint, list of columns which the constraint constrains │ > > > From that I wouldn't have figured it'd apply to foreign keys > > as well. So I assume it is fair to say that "foreign keys > > are one type of table constraint", right ? > > Right. I think what the comment is actually trying to point out is that > conkey isn't relevant to domain constraints, which also appear in > pg_constraint. Can someone come up with better documention wording for conkey? I can't: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-constraint.html -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general