On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 19:33 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 11:29 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > As I said before, if you think something is missing, submit a software > > > or a doc patch and submit it to peer review. Until then, I think its > > > misleading to claim that only your magic spice makes replication work > > > correctly and to make out everybody else had to go through huge pains to > > > get it to work. Cos I get emails all the time saying how easy it was to > > > configure and easy to administrate. > > > > I didn't say only my magic does that. What I said was purely factual. > > That PostgreSQL by itself doesn't provide everything you need to get log > > shipping working and my *ONLY* point was that we should be clear when > > people ask, that they will have to roll their own to a degree. > > Software or doc patch, please, if you want them to be really clear. We can't back patch features and like I said previously, 8.4 doesn't really suffer from this assuming you get your patch committed. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
