Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Decreasing WAL size effects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

The real reason not to put that functionality into core (or even
contrib) is that it's a stopgap kluge.  What the people who want this
functionality *really* want is continuous (streaming) log-shipping, not
WAL-segment-at-a-time shipping.

Sure, and that's why I didn't care when this got kicked out of the March CommitFest; was hoping a better one would show up. But if 8.4 isn't going out the door with the feature people really want, it would be nice to at least make the stopgap kludge more easily available.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux