On Thursday 23 October 2008, Collin Kidder <adderd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You must use Reply All. You > might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it more as a > sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping types would ever > want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll have to live with the > current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. But, even after having > heard the arguments I'm not convinced that this list's behavior is > desirable. YMMV. If it bugs you that much, just fix it for yourself. :0 fr * ^(To:|Cc:).*pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx* | /usr/bin/formail -I "Reply-To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" .. and eliminate any dupes: :0 Whc: /home/$USER/.msgid.lock |/usr/bin/formail -D 1024 /home/$USER/.msgid.cache If your MUA doesn't work right, procmail is your friend. -- Alan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
